For much of the 20th century, the Liar paradox has stood as an elusive and stubborn puzzle. The main solutions to it have significant drawbacks, such as blocking meaningful cases of self-reference or abandoning bivalence (the principle that all propositions are either true or false and not both). In recent decades, Stephen Read has rediscovered and defended a solution by the medieval thinker Thomas Bradwardine. If Bradwardine's argument is correct, the liar sentence is simply false. When properly examined, its falsity does not imply its truth. Bradwardine shows this with a clever argument that does not require us to abandon classical logic or block self-reference. It does rely on a controversial principle, "closure": any statement implicitly says (or means) everything that follows from what it says. Arguably, whether the Bradwardine solution succeeds or fails to conclusively solve the Liar depends on whether one accepts closure. In this interview, Stephen Read runs through Bradwardine's argument in some detail, then defends it against a few objections.
Bradwardine's argument is rather subtle and abstract and can be hard to follow verbally. Here's a short written version of Bradwardine's argument, with minimum symbolism, that shows each step and notes where logical principles are invoked.
Be sure to listen to the first half of this interview, where Stephen explains the Liar and its significance and solutions in the 20th century.
Next week: Jason Lee Byas: Against Criminal Justice
Visit http://williamnava.com or more info!
Stephen Read (homepage)
Thomas Bradwardine's Insolubilia (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
"The Liar from John Buridan back to Thomas Bradwardine" (Stephen Read)
"Read on Bradwardine on the Liar" (Graham Priest)
"Lessons on truth from medieval solutions to the Liar paradox" (C. Dutilh Novaes)
2:20 - Intro on medieval logic
5:17 - Restriction and cassation
9:55 - Possibility of self-reference
14:38 - Intro to Bradwardine's solution
22:19 - Running through Bradwardine's argument
28:39 - Bradwardine's theory of truth v. Tarski's
32:29 - Objection to Bradwardine's closure principle
55:16 - Do sentences say they are true?
1:00:59 - Priest's Principle of Uniform Solution